Sweat and Ethics: Unpacking Dilemmas in Athletic Research

CASE STUDY 1: “PUSHING THE LIMITS”

Context: A university researcher is studying the effects of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) on performance improvement among young athletes. The study involves pushing participants to their maximum physical capacity over a six-week period. While most participants show improvement, a few report severe muscle fatigue and stress fractures. Some athletes feel pressured to keep pushing beyond their limits, fearing that they will be seen as weak if they withdraw from the study.

Discussion Point: Is it ethical for the researcher to continue the study without modifying the intensity levels, knowing that some participants are experiencing negative physical effects? Should there be a reassessment of the risks involved in the study?

Analysis: Research that pushes physical limits requires careful monitoring and a balance between potential benefits and risks. The researcher has a responsibility to ensure the safety and well-being of participants, and it may be necessary to adapt the study design to avoid injury. Continuing without adjustments could compromise the ethical principles of non-maleficence (do no harm) and respect for participant autonomy. Clear communication about participants’ right to withdraw without consequences is essential in such high-stakes studies.

CASE STUDY 2: “TEAM DYNAMICS AND ANXIETY”

Context: A sports psychologist is conducting a study on team dynamics and how different leadership styles…